Today, when I prepared some briefs for Torts, I set the text in Garamond instead of Times New Roman.
The difference between the two fonts isn’t really important; the point is that I took a few minutes to doll my briefs up a bit, and afterward, I realized that it was satisfying. Actually, it felt liberating. It didn’t seem significant at the time, so I couldn’t understand why using a different typeface was registering with some part of me as being so important.
I thought about it some, and I decided that what I really found so gratifying was that by using Garamond instead of Times New Roman, I injected a little bit of aesthetics into my daily life. There hasn’t been a whole lot of that lately; attention to aesthetic detail seems to be lost in law school. I think I’ve been missing it.
The law school environment places a premium on getting to the core of an issue; the fewer frills, the better. We throw out colorful language in favor of terse but accurate description. The abandonment of decoration spills over elsewhere. Textbooks are dense tomes of solid text – an illustration is unthinkable. Our papers are always twelve-point Times New Roman, probably with one-inch margins. Our thought, our presentation, and our expression must be crisp and clear. The message underlying it all seems to be: get to the point, and fast.
Earlier today I got a letter in the mail. I opened it and shortly I was scanning a Thanksgiving letter from my mother, seeking out that all-important main point. I caught myself after a minute and adjusted my attention to actually reading the letter, instead of putting everything through the “ESSENTIAL INFORMATION ONLY” filter.
As long as I retain the ability to turn off that filter, I think I’ll be okay. Now, to brief some cases.